Just by looking
back at the history of the giallo and
its recognized birth, automatically, controversy strikes as to why
this genre of film has been kept in the dark from an artistic standpoint and
rather labeled as an exploitative genre.
The giallo takes
its name from a series of lurid thrillers with trademark yellow covers (giallo means 'yellow' in Italian),
which first appeared in Italy in
1929. Typically Latin in nature, the giallo took
the staid crime novel and spiced it up with doses of sex, glamour and violence
- and great soundtracks. (Kerswell, 2010 p44)
What Kerswell is
saying here is that the giallo took
inspiration from the lurid thriller novels that were popular travel reading
material; and to make them stand out from traditional crime thrillers,
the giallo added elements
of sex and violence that would excite and please a cinematic audience looking
to be entertained.
The
later giallo filmmakers
tend to be contextualized within other forms of exploitation horror cinema,
although often they worked in as many different genres as were being produced
within Italian cinema at the time-mondo documentaries, zombie pictures, police
action films (poliziotto), and sex
comedies. So most histories of giallo cinema,
such as are available, contextu-alize the genre within the history of Italian
horror cinema, rather than the crime film, with Mario Bava unofficially
credited with inventing the giallo as
a cinematic genre. (Koven, 2006 p3)
What I think
Koven is trying to say here, is that because of the later forms of the giallo grew more into the
exploitation genre of film making of the time, with the increased amount of sex
and graphic violence being shown; the genre itself lost it’s original identity
and has since become shoehorned into the history of Italian Horror rather than
it’s true roots which would be more akin to the crime thriller; this lead to
Mario Bava being recorded as the father of the genre, even though there had
been previous films based on the source material.
Despite the fact
the gialli’s roots are
deeply set in the thriller genre that can best be summed up as simply as murder
mysteries; looking into the lurid thrillers that were being released in Italy
at the time, they were predominately Italian translations of British/American
writers including some household names and highly respected writers like Agatha
Christie and Ellery Queen for example; yet despite having these roots in well
respected works within literature, the giallo has
become no more than a exploitative horror genre that it seems, only has what can
best be described as a cult following outside of Italy. And it seems that not
just the miss-interpretation of the giallo with
regards to genre, but also its birth with Mario Bava’s The Girl Who Knew Too Much (1962)
commonly regarded as the invention of the genre. It was actually released
almost 20 years after the first giallo film.
Literally the first giallo film was made under Mus-solini's nose toward the end of Italy 's
participation in the Second World War. Luchino Visconti's Ossessione (1942), although mostly
heralded as the first neorealist film, since the film is loosely based on James
M. Caine's novel The Postman Always
Rings Twice (1934), is also the first giallo film. (Koven, 2006 p3)
Here Koven is
pointing out that Ossessione (1942)
is actually the first giallo film
and pre-dates Bava’s The Girl Who
Knew Too Much (1962) (commonly labeled the first giallo film) by 20 years.
What I feel this
points out is a certain phobia that film academics and film theory writers have
with the possibility of high art being linked with any genre of film that is
considered to be low art or exploitive, in turn indirectly labeling those films
to be less valuable than those considered high art. But it is not the murder
and the violence that makes a film a giallo,
it is the work of the lurid thrillers with their yellow covers. Of course the
genre grew on to be more violent and graphic but to deny the genre it’s history
just because some might feel it tarnishes a highly regarded genre is
unacceptable. The film Ossessione (1942)
itself does have significant links to the giallo genre that bursts into peak during the 1960s and 1970s
when the surrounding history of Mussolini crops up again in genre again, this
time not surrounding the release of the giallo film but the effects of Mussolini on the characters
within the genre.
The gialli were
not intended for consumption in the first-run theaters in Italy or
meant to circulate internationally through film festivals and art-house
theaters. These films circulated on the margins of Italian, European, and
International film exhibition-the drive-ins and
grindhouses, rather than the art houses. They appealed to the
most salacious aspects of literary crime fiction, thereby making these films
closer in spirit to horror films than to mysteries. (Koven, 2006 p16)
Koven here is
pointing out that the giallo wasn't
intended to be viewed by the same audience of those in the high art population
being shown in various art houses; the giallo was
being targeted to the audience of the drive-ins and the grindhouse scene where the
audience is purely looking to be entertained and the narrative can almost play
as a second fiddle, as it's target audience would have a more relaxed approach
to consumption.
And within this context, not only in terms of
production but perhaps more importantly consumption, a traditional
aesthetic consideration of the giallo alongside high-art
filmmakers such as Fellini, Bertolucci, and Antonioni cannot work. The giallo is not high art; it is
vernacular in its mark-keting, consumption, and production. (Koven, 2006 p16)
Here I think
that Koven really hits the nail on the head as to why the giallo and the high art works from
Italian directors of the same era are kept from being linked. He points out
that the aesthetics and consumption and production are so vastly different and
the giallo itself cannot be
considered high art therefore trying to juxtapose the giallo with the high art movement wouldn't be complementary or
beneficial to either the high art or the exploitative horror.
But returning to
the birth of the giallo as
it is seen most commonly today; there are 3 films that together give birth to
the traditional giallo that
became hugely popular in the 1970s and early 1980s. Though it was Mario Bava
who is credited with creating the genre as we know it, beginning with The Girl Who Knew Too Much (1962)
and again 2 years later with Blood
and Black Lace (1964) it isn’t until Dario Argento’s The Bird with the Crystal Plumage (1970)
that the giallo’s identity
is set in stone and the masked killer becomes infamous.
Bava's The
Girl Who Knew Too Much (La
Ragazza che sapev troppo) (1962) established the giallo films' narrative structure: an innocent person, often a
tourist, witnesses a brutal murder that appears to be the work of a serial
killer. He or she takes on the role of amateur detective in order to hunt down
this killer, and often succeeds where the police fail. Two years later, Bava
further developed the genre with Blood
and Black Lace (Sei donne per
l'assassino) (1964). This film, although the narrative structure is quite
dif-ferent from Girl, introduced
to the genre specific visual tropes that would be-come cliched. Specifically,
the graphic violence was against beautiful women; there were many murders
committed (in Girl, all the
victims ware stabbed the same way, but in Blood and Black Lace we see stabbings, strangu-lations,
smothering, burnings, and other violent acts); but most important is the
introduction of what was to become the archetypal giallo killer's disguise: black leather gloves, black
overcoat, wide-brimmed black hat, and often a black stocking over the face.
(Koven, 2006 p3-4)
Here Koven is
telling us how Mario Bava created the now considered traditional giallo; he first points out that The Girl Who Knew Too Much (1962)
builds the narrative structure of the giallo and
2 years later with his next film Blood
and Black Lace (1964) Bava creates the graphic murder sequences adding
more creative techniques and weapons that were missing in Girl and also adding the famous
image of the giallo killer;
dressed in disguise with black leather gloves etc…The combination of the two
creating what is now consider the traditional giallo.
The year 1970 is generally considered the key
threshold for giallo cinema,
due to the international success of Dario Argento's The Bird with the Crystal Plumage (L'uccello dale piume di cristallo) (1970), which takes the innocent
eyewitness who becomes an amateur detective through a grisly series of murders
from Bava's Girl and adds
the graphic violence and iconically dressed killer (black hat, gloves, and
raincoat) from Bava's Blood and
Black Lace. It is this combina-tion that really defines the giallo film as it is more commonly
understood. An av-alanche of similar films was quickly brought out by Italian
producers looking to cash in on Argento's success, all using combinations and
variations on the com-plexity of the mystery, with the
standard giallo-killer disguise. (Koven, 2006 p4)
Here Koven tells
us how director Dario Argento with his film The Bird with the Crystal Plumage (1970) (which combines both
elements of Bava’s The Girl Who Knew
Too Much (1962) and Blood
and Black Lace (1964) to create the traditional giallo) and it’s international success
created the opportunity for more Italian filmmakers to direct giallos in it’s vein as producers
were keen to use Argento’s film as a template for financial gain.
Not only
does The Bird with the Crystal
Plumage (1970) become the film that sets the rollers in motion for
the giallo to take off into
commercial success, but it is also the starting point for Dario Argento to
becoming the widely regarded master of giallo and
ultimately becoming the only director with the power of his internationally
recognizable name to be able to continually direct gialli after the genres apparent demise in the late 1980s.
No comments:
Post a Comment